I’m a strong believer that quality( and, thus, software testing) should be the immediate priority for any type of organization- whether it’s a startup or “owners corporations”. Software testing is your health insurance – you don’t believe you need it until you receive a hospital bill for thousands of dollars. Let me explain my thoughts.
Why is it crucial for organizations to invest in software testing?
I’ve been doing quality assurance for more than a decade now. That doesn’t sound like a lot of time unless you remember what QA looked like in the early 2000 s. I was in college working on my master’s degree in computer science at a six-year program with lots of material on software engineering, growth, architecture and project management. I also took several courses on business analysis, developing UML and BPMN diagrams for the solutions I was building in Java,. Net and RoR. The only thing missing from the program was quality assurance.
Normally, the professors tested our run by looking at our answers and randomly clicking links and buttons or entering nonsense text in every text field on the screen. On one occasion, my answer crashed after such user testing. That’s when QA came into my life.
Although QA was not a part of college programs- and I can hardly even recollect develops outside of college- there were several books that started the journey. I joined a1qa when testing was still called a “monkey job”- simple and unqualified. Now, a decade subsequently, I have seen big changes. When person asks me why these changes have resulted, I tell two stories.
The importance of quality
Do you remember the software of the 1990 s?
Just a few quick facts: The internet as we know it started in 1991. Facebook began in 2004, and the first iPhone was released in 2007.
If you compare the software products from then to what we have now, it’s like comparing the management of a 500 -person town to the management of New York City. The intricacy of these software products is growing much faster than anyone could have expected. Your end users are more demanding: they want better interface, faster application, accessibility from wherever and whatever and so on.
Software is a business. It’s all about fund- making money through subscriptions, ads or reengineering your business to maximize gains. In the early 1990 s, the only route to play Solitaire was to access it as a part of Windows on your computer. A quick search of mobile apps shows that there are more than 200 applications that allow the same today. The competitor is much differently constituted, and that’s where quality comes into play. If your product is not good enough, your clients have 199 alternatives to replace it.
I use Uber and Lyft for my daily commute. I talk to drivers all the time, asking them the same question: Why do you drive with this company? The two factors I hear from them are the amount of money they can make and how good the application is for them. For riders, it’s somewhat the same. The focus is on the cost of service and the usability of the app. The quality of the software is something that drives users from both sides. The better the quality and functionality of the software, the more riders a company get; the more fund the drivers construct, the better discounts or loyalty programs the company can introduce. Whether you like it or not, quality is growing increasingly important.
The importance of testing
This second narrative is even more straightforward.
Most of us use airliners and automobiles. Would you ride in a automobile or take a seat on an airplane if you knew these vehicles were not tested? Would you feel safe and reassuring? Would you buy from that producer or airline again? It’s human nature to avoid risks if possible.
And it’s human nature to believe that a service provider is taking care of you rather than adding risks to your life. One problem may be fatal. Check out recent stories on Equifax or Facebook if you don’t believe me.
Why do many companies still feel reluctant to invest in testing?
The biggest issue with quality assurance is that the result of implementing testing practises is somewhat invisible. When your company invests in software growth, you see the results right away. There is a piece of software to play with, a codebase to review, and a database to use to see data.
With testing, yes, you have a test plan and exam scripts that you can run, but you cannot sell these to your end users. Users do not care if you do test automation or security testing; they only want to believe the software is running correctly.
They are not concerned with how you achieve this.
The biggest blunder I’ve seen is believing that the development team is adequate to accomplish the project alone- the members know your business needs, understand requirements, they know the technology, etc. The thing is- nobody’s perfect. Every developer is a human being which entails mistakes are highly possible.
It’s a business decision whether to ignore this risk or mitigate it through working with a professional testing team.
However, our world is fraught with other hazards one cannot even predict. Why not mitigate those predictable hazards through quality assurance that will help your organization survive other storms?
Read more: business.com